Homework

Link to previous assignments.

Answers to some exercises are available as indicated by links below.  If you cannot obtain an answer or are unsure of your answer, discuss the problem with each other or with anyone else who might be helpful.

Don't forget about the Links page: from there you can access many powerful Web-based applications for computing and plotting probability distributions.

Due Assignment
20 February
  1. Complete textbook exercises 4.1, 4.6, 4.7, 4.8, 4.9, 4.10, 4.11, 4.12, 4.13, 4.14, 4.15, 4.16, 4.17, 4.18, and 4.20.  (90 min.)
  2. Compute by hand, without reference to a table, calculator, or computer, the natural logarithms of the integers 1, 2, 3, ..., 20 to two decimal places.  Then check your answers.  (Excel will compute them for you using its LN() function.)  If you got any incorrect--even by one in the last digit--identify the reason why and redo the computation until you can get them all correct.  Then draw a precise graph of y = ln(x) for x between 0.05 and 20.  (45 min.)
  3. Compute by hand, to two decimal places, the logarithms of 9.5, 9.6, 9.7, ..., 10.5.  (1 minute.)
  4. * A risk assessor assumes, as part of a modeling exercise, that the dose of a carcinogen received by a human through contact with it in the environment is proportional to the product of its concentration and the duration of the exposure.  Suppose she has data suggesting the concentration is lognormally distributed throughout the environment with a mean of 37 parts per million (ppm) and a standard deviation of 24 ppm, and the exposure duration in the affected human population also is lognormally distributed with a mean of 5 years and standard deviation of 2 years.  Assume the exposure duration is independent of the concentration (why is this usually a reasonable assumption?  Why should it be checked?).   A "deterministic" risk model might well use these mean values for its inputs, resulting in 37 * 5 = 185 ppm-years.  What is the probability that the product of concentration and duration will exceed 185 ppm-years?    What is the probability that this product will exceed 1,000 ppm-years?  For what value is this "exceedance" probability exactly equal to five percent?  (Hint: work in terms of the logarithms of concentration and exposure and recall that the sum of two normal distributions is normal.)  (30 min.)
  5. Using a table of the cdf of the standard normal distribution (or an equivalent table, such as the one handed out in class), find the following probabilities, or determine why they do not make sense.  Z is a random variable distributed normally with mean 0 and standard deviation 1.
    a.  Z is greater than 2.
    b.  Z is between -0.5 and 0.5.
    c.  Z is greater than 1 or less than -0.5.
    d.  Z is not equal to 0.
    e.  Z2 is greater than 4.
    f.   exp(Z) is greater than 1.
    (15 min.)
  6. Graph the cdf of the following distributions.
    a.  A uniform random variable with values between -1 and 1.
    b.  A uniform random variable with values between 0 and 3.
    c.  A mixture of 25% (a) and 75% (b).
    d.  A variable that has a 25% chance of being 0, a 50% chance of being 1, and a 25% chance of being 2.
    e.  A mixture of  50% (a) and 50% (d).
    (30 min.)
  7. Read Chapter 5, pages 201 through  228. (30 min.)
  8. To prepare for the quiz, review last week's material on Excel, simulations, and solving probability problems using box models.

Total estimated time: 4:01 hours + review time.

Return to the Environmental Statistics home page

The URL for this page is

This page was created 15 February and last updated 19 February 2001 (to include specific links to answers).