Time: 20 minutes. This quiz is open book, open notes.
An agency purports to have developed a 90% lower confidence limit (LCL) of the mean arsenic concentration in water as measured in 100 wells throughout southern Bangladesh. These wells were randomly selected from all those used to supply water to southern Bangladesh (the "country"). The value of the LCL is 235 parts per billion (micrograms per liter).
The phrase "people in the country" below will mean "people who routinely drink untreated water from arsenic-contaminated wells like those surveyed by the agency." (This apparently is about half the people living in Bangladesh.)
1. Indicate which of the following statements are correct and which are incorrect. Provide reasons for each. Credit is given only for answers accompanied by reasons.
2. To develop the LCL in problem 1, the agency assumed the sampling distribution of the mean would be Normal, but of unknown mean and standard deviation. It also reports that the mean of the 100 concentrations was 320 ppb. Compute the 90% upper confidence limit (UCL) of the mean.
Extra credit: (a) Compute the standard deviation of the data. (The 10th percentile of Student's t distribution with 99 degrees of freedom is -1.29). (b) Using this information, explain why the UCL (as computed in problem 2) has likely been substantially underestimated.
Scoring: The passing score is 88.
![]()
NB: Arsenic is a "documented human carcinogen." The US EPA maximum contaminant level (MCL) is 5 ppb, although the national drinking water standard is still 50 ppb. Around the world, concentrations in water exceeding 10 to 50 ppb are considered unhealthful. The "agency" in problem 1 and the numbers appearing on this quiz are made up but are consistent with available summary statistics (see below).
For more information on the arsenic problem in Bangladesh,
see http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact210.html
(World Health Organization).
For some actual data, see http://www.kfunigraz.ac.at/fwiwww/aan/newsl2/contamin.html
("Asia Arsenic Network"), http://www.bicn.com/acic/resources/infobank/brac1.htm
("Arsenic Crisis Info Centre"), and http://ehpnet1.niehs.nih.gov/docs/1999/107p727-729tondel/abstract.html
(Tondel et al., Environmental Health
Perspectives Volume 107, Number 9, September 1999).
![]()
Return to the Environmental Statistics home page
This page is copyright (c) 2001 Quantitative Decisions. Please cite it as
This page was created 19 March 2001.